Did Piers Morgan (58) know more than he admits? Prince Harry (39) has been fighting in court against the newspaper publisher Mirror Group Newspaper for several months. Among other things, he is said to have used illegal wiretapping methods to obtain information. Just a few hours ago, Harry achieved a partial victory when he was awarded compensation. But it’s not over yet: now it has to be too Piers answer in court.
As The Standard reports, have Piers worked as an editor for one of the newspapers in question between 1995 and 2004. So far he has denied being involved in the phone hacking. But now the tide could turn, because a statement from journalist Omid Scobie incriminates the moderator. Omid claims namely, Piers As an intern in 2002, I heard him say that he had obtained certain information from the hacked phones. “I found Mr. Scobie to be an honest and reliable witness,” the judge said. Piers will now have to explain itself.
That of all things Omid makes the decisive statement Piers didn’t like it at all. The two have already clashed over his exposé book. Above all, the headlines surrounding the sudden naming of King Charles (75) and Princess Kate (41) left off Piers doubt the credibility of the self-proclaimed royal expert. Omid himself is now more than frustrated because of the accusations.
